<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Must Move</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leahandmark.com/2009/07/02/we-must-move/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leahandmark.com/2009/07/02/we-must-move/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=we-must-move</link>
	<description>Life is More Than You or Me, it's Us.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:42:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarkRoX</title>
		<link>http://leahandmark.com/2009/07/02/we-must-move/comment-page-1/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkRoX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leahandmark.com/?p=867#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>Hey Tina,  
 
Thanks!... did you find us or did I find you first? I can&#039;t remember... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tina,  </p>
<p>Thanks!&#8230; did you find us or did I find you first? I can&#039;t remember&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Steele Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://leahandmark.com/2009/07/02/we-must-move/comment-page-1/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Steele Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leahandmark.com/?p=867#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>I love this video.  And the music.  Really.  I do.  A lot. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this video.  And the music.  Really.  I do.  A lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah_108</title>
		<link>http://leahandmark.com/2009/07/02/we-must-move/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah_108</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leahandmark.com/?p=867#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>Ohhh, yeah, about the windows - apparently the building codes changed significantly after the hotel was built, so they can&#039;t just replace the windows that were broken... they have to replace ALL of the windows (over 6,000 of them), and that is going to cost over a million dollars.  I guess they haven&#039;t come up with the money yet.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh, yeah, about the windows &#8211; apparently the building codes changed significantly after the hotel was built, so they can&#039;t just replace the windows that were broken&#8230; they have to replace ALL of the windows (over 6,000 of them), and that is going to cost over a million dollars.  I guess they haven&#039;t come up with the money yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Maples</title>
		<link>http://leahandmark.com/2009/07/02/we-must-move/comment-page-1/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Maples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leahandmark.com/?p=867#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>I think the thing with me is, for 99% of my shots I don&#039;t distinguish between &quot;people&quot; and &quot;things&quot; - people are just one type of thing that may or may not be a part of a moment I&#039;m capturing.  If they&#039;re there in the moment, either as the main subject or peripherally, then they get captured.  If they&#039;re not there, I&#039;m not going to deliberately or artificially stick a person in there for the sake of it, because then it&#039;s just a posed snapshot, and as you know, I am the anti-pose when it comes to photography.  I much prefer getting natural captures, and whether or not they have people in them just doesn&#039;t matter to me. 
 
Glad you&#039;re digging the new site layout - I&#039;m really happy with it, and can&#039;t wait to start exploring what it can do.  I think the fact that you&#039;re reading it again (and that my subscriber numbers are going up sharply) proves my theory that having a good layout does actually improve one&#039;s experience of the content, providing that the content is at least of a halfway decent standard. 
 
By the way, I love all the shots in this post, and I&#039;m shocked that a place as first-world as Atlanta wouldn&#039;t have fixed those windows by now.  Even in Turkey they get stuff like that replaced right away.  But as with most broken things, the window holes make a better photo than regular windows would have.  So yay for that! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the thing with me is, for 99% of my shots I don&#039;t distinguish between &quot;people&quot; and &quot;things&quot; &#8211; people are just one type of thing that may or may not be a part of a moment I&#039;m capturing.  If they&#039;re there in the moment, either as the main subject or peripherally, then they get captured.  If they&#039;re not there, I&#039;m not going to deliberately or artificially stick a person in there for the sake of it, because then it&#039;s just a posed snapshot, and as you know, I am the anti-pose when it comes to photography.  I much prefer getting natural captures, and whether or not they have people in them just doesn&#039;t matter to me. </p>
<p>Glad you&#039;re digging the new site layout &#8211; I&#039;m really happy with it, and can&#039;t wait to start exploring what it can do.  I think the fact that you&#039;re reading it again (and that my subscriber numbers are going up sharply) proves my theory that having a good layout does actually improve one&#039;s experience of the content, providing that the content is at least of a halfway decent standard. </p>
<p>By the way, I love all the shots in this post, and I&#039;m shocked that a place as first-world as Atlanta wouldn&#039;t have fixed those windows by now.  Even in Turkey they get stuff like that replaced right away.  But as with most broken things, the window holes make a better photo than regular windows would have.  So yay for that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkRoX</title>
		<link>http://leahandmark.com/2009/07/02/we-must-move/comment-page-1/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkRoX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leahandmark.com/?p=867#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>Not yet. But we&#039;re moving... oh no, OTP. Don&#039;t tell anyone.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not yet. But we&#039;re moving&#8230; oh no, OTP. Don&#039;t tell anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas</title>
		<link>http://leahandmark.com/2009/07/02/we-must-move/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leahandmark.com/?p=867#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>Move?  You&#039;re not leaving Atlanta, are you? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move?  You&#039;re not leaving Atlanta, are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
